Current:Home > NewsKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -MarketMind
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-27 16:01:32
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (27982)
Related
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- US Open: Tiafoe, Fritz and Navarro reach the semifinals and make American tennis matter again
- Why isn't Rashee Rice suspended? What we know about Chiefs WR's legal situation
- Jury selection will begin in Hunter Biden’s tax trial months after his gun conviction
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- Proof Christina Hall and Ex Ant Anstead Are on Better Terms After Custody Battle
- What to Know About Rebecca Cheptegei, the Olympic Runner Set on Fire in a Gasoline Attack
- Republican Liz Cheney endorses Kamala Harris
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- An inherited IRA can boost your finances, but new IRS rules may mean a tax headache
Ranking
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Police exchange fire and shoot an armed man near a museum and the Israeli Consulate in Munich
- NYC teacher grazed by bullet fired through school window
- Lala Kent Gives Birth, Welcomes Baby No. 2
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- White Lotus' Meghann Fahy Debuts Daring Sheer Lingerie Look on Red Carpet
- US Open: Tiafoe, Fritz and Navarro reach the semifinals and make American tennis matter again
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Open Wide
Recommendation
Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
Brian Stelter rejoining CNN 2 years after he was fired by cable network
Voting-related lawsuits filed in multiple states could be a way to contest the presidential election
Report: Mountain Valley Pipeline test failure due to manufacturer defect, not corrosion
Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
The Sweet Way Olivia Culpo and Christian McCaffrey Stay Connected During the NFL Season
Alaska governor vetoes bill requiring insurance cover a year of birth control at a time
Lady Gaga and Fiancé Michael Polansky Share Rare Insight Into Their Private World